Hierarchy of needs - pocojo - May 31st 2008
While there is some intuitive rightness to the hierarchic structure proposed by Maslow, that may generally help to prioritize which problems to tackle first (e.g. housing more urgent than therapy for the homeless). However, on an individual level I'd agree with detractors of that ranking (like Max-Neef) in that the urgency of resolving basic needs of different levels might not respond to that hierarchy, might indeed be non-hierarchical at all. I can easily imagine a person whose self-esteem issues might mess with his job-security. Thus, a second-level need (employment) might depend on solving a third-level need (self-esteem). If things go really bad, this person might find it impossible to keep a job, thus being unable to supply first-level needs (housing, food, etc) because of a third-level defficiency. In this case, helping to develop this person's self-esteem will probably do more good in the long run than giving the person free housing and free food, which might mess up his or her self-esteem even worse. (Note: don't take this as a critic on welfare, please. I'm talking about a hypothetic individual, not a policy). In my case, I have issues all over the hierarchy. But I'll be hard pressed to isolate my first-level needs without taking my confidence levels and even my need for creativity into account. It just won't work for long, I've tried. |